Divided Expectations
Over the past several months, we have been conducting
some intriguing research on the relationship between senior management
and the people directly reporting to them.
We asked both groups what they most expected or
needed from the other. As you might surmise, we found some interesting
results.
Findings:
First, the most frequent answer from senior management
about what they most expected from their direct reports was the
delivery of business results. Whether it was stated as making plan,
retiring quota, or hitting the numbers, the message was clearly
about fulfilling the financial business objectives.
In the same light, the most common answer from
the direct reports about what they expected from senior management:
provision of the necessary resources and appropriate assistance
so plan could be made.
Doesn't seem to be a lot of confusion around that
issue. Whether the specific targets are always perfectly clear or
not, both groups are in step on the importance and expectations
of the financial results.
But, check out the following set of responses!
Senior managers next said they need their direct
reports to provide more options, that is, thoughtful, proactive
alternative courses of action. They were quick to admit that as
the senior team, they did not have all the answers. Usually included
in this response was the need for direct reports to take more risks
and try new things.
On the other hand, the direct reports said they
wanted to be heard more frequently and trusted more fully by the
senior team.
These responses are not aligned. They reflect
an interesting dilemma that holds back a lot of organizations.
It is difficult to pinpoint the one main reason
why this dilemma occurs, but it is rarely intentional. We have found
little evidence of senior managers saying the want or need options,
and then consciously blocking the attempts of their people to provide
them. Nor have we found the direct reporting groups to be merely
a bunch of whiners. They usually have some compelling examples of
being ignored or discounted by the senior team.
Steps to Take:
So what can you do to close the gap between these
surprisingly different viewpoints? Here are some options for each
group of managers to consider.
For Senior Management:
- Assume (or admit) that you are in fact not
listening to your direct reports and thus are sending a disabling,
mixed message to them. Take some responsibility for their perceptions
of not being heard vs. trying to prove they are mistaken.
- Examine the processes you have for getting
options surfaced. When the senior team meets, do you allocate
agenda time to hear and consider proposals from your people? Do
you address an option in a timely manner or put it into some kind
of labyrinth, where it must pass through seemingly endless layers
of bureaucracy and exhaustive examination before it can ever be
surfaced for consideration.
- Examine your beliefs about the talent at the
next level? Is it possible that you really don't have much faith
in their judgments? Do you truly believe they are able to forward
an idea that you have not already considered?
- Examine your communications/feedback processes.
Are you thoughtfully tabling and discussing the ideas and options
of your direct reports, but never letting them know?
- Have some one on one dialogue with your people
to find out why they do not believe they are being heard - or
trusted. Address those concerns head on, right now.
For the Direct Reporting Level:
- Examine why you are not being heard. Have you
done your homework? Are you persistent enough? Do you have some
genuine conviction about your ideas or are you really just launching
trial balloons?
- Examine your beliefs. Are your perceptions
about not being heard really valid today, or are they spawned
from myths or previous experiences that occurred some time ago?
- Examine the way you try to advance options.
Are you proactive? Are you getting on the right calendars? Do
senior people recognize when you are putting forth a valid option
vs. merely thinking out loud?
- Have a candid discussion with your boss (and
perhaps your self) about the extent that you are worthy of being
listened to and trusted. Are you consistently expanding and demonstrating
your capabilities? Are you perceived as providing good results
or good excuses? Do you think about the business like a senior
team member?
The bad news is there are a lot of organizations
experiencing this dilemma right now. If you are one of them, the
good news is the solution is within your grasp. Do not let another
day go by without confronting the issue when it surfaces. The stakes
are too high in terms of both organization performance and strong
work relationships to let it continue to fester.
Click here for last month's lesson: Update
on Generation X
- Home Page - About
ILA - Articles - Leadership Journal - Programs & Services
- Success Stories -
- Assessments / Instruments -
Continuing Development - Leadership
Model - Partners - Contact
Us -
All materials Copyright © 1999-2007 International Leadership Associates.
All rights reserved.
No portion of this publication may be reproduced in any form or
by any means without written permission of International Leadership
Associates.
|